During closing arguments, Lumka Xoxo, said their evidence could not be believed and that they had been “coached”. She described their evidence as “dramatic” and said only those children instructed to do so had taken the stand.

Xoxo argued that the rapes could not have happened because there had been other people around when they allegedly took place.

Molefe is facing three charges of rape and eleven of sexual assault which he allegedly committed in 2017.

While giving his testimony last week, Molefe said the case against him was a plot to remove him as the security guard so that the principal Maria Mthimkhulu could be harmed because she was allegedly stealing the school’s money.

READ MORE: AB Xuma Primary School Scholar Patroller was framed – Defence

On Monday, Xoxo argued that a girl who had said she had a vaginal infection could have got it from not cleaning herself correctly in the toilet and not because she was touched by Molefe.

She said there were material contradictions by the witnesses that the court needed to consider.

Xoxo said there was no evidence that one of the girls was raped by Molefe.

She said it was unlikely that another one of the girls could have been sexually assaulted by Molefe during their lunch break next to the school gate where there were vendors and other children around.

One of the girls who testified against Molefe told the court that she went to report him to her teacher who instructed her to tell Molefe to stop touching her.

Xoxo said it was unlikely that a teacher would tell a child who had been a victim of sexual assault to tell the perpetrator to stop what he was doing.

READ MORE: More girls testify in the AB Xuma case

She said one of the children was in communication with the other witnesses during the trial which was irregular.

“The state failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt that Mkhulu (the name the children used for Molefe) committed these offences,” Xoxo said.

– African News Agency